https://medwinpublishers.com/PSBJ/index.php
About the teleportation of a proton
Adib
Ben Jebara
Retired
Tunis,
Tunisia
January 2022
In :
https://www.ashese.co.uk/ajps-v5-issue-3/about-teleportation-of-elementary-particles-of-physics
I wrote :
In:http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-4/about-entanglement-of-elementary-particles-of-physics, I wrote in one paragraph:
About
experimenting
“Let us try to describe an experiment
where a proton travels a distance in a given time and another experiment where
it travels the same distance in no time. After the coupling of 2 protons, the proton
which is taken away should instead be left moving by itself. The particle could
teleport itself without it being a teleportation of information only”.
In: http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v6-issue-1/about-a-new-philosophy, I wrote at the end:
“It is because we do not know the values
of the orthogonal time for the particle that we know the position of the
particle onlywith a probability. When we measure, we make the orthogonal time
of the particle constant (equal to zero?), that is why we know the position of
the particle. We go from a vague knowledge to a precise knowledge rather than
change the reality of the position by measuring”.
In the first link
above, it was stated that the second elementary particle uses only orthogonal
time and not time at our level when taken away from the first particle in the
entanglement. Time at the level of an elementary particle can be different from
time at our level and that is in some manner counterintuitive. Such a research
can lead to some research and development but there is the fashion of quantum
computing preventing much other research.
.......
there was an early remark, for criticizing, that a
hidden variable should be looked for. The hidden variable is no other than the
second coordinate of time.
End of quote
from earlier texts.
The
suggested experiment of teleportation
looks simple
but is not.
It
raises several questions.
The first
question is : does the particle travels in our
past until
our present or does it travel in our present ?
The second
question is :
how far can
the paricule travel if not stopped (we are in the case of 2 protons) ?
The third
question is : has the coupling and entanglement of two protons
to be done
like it was done before or could it be done with less means ?
The fourth
question is : why is it difficult to find someone interested
in the
proposal of experiment (published some time ago) ?
Do people
think that they must skip anything basic to deserve
their salary
?
The fifth
question is :
Is there a
number of particles for which time becomes totally
ordered ?
From aggregating ?
I wrote in :
https://www.ashese.co.uk/ajp-v3-issue-1/about-elementary-particles-of-physics
“Let us notice
that Newton first law is partly contradicted: F=0, V constant but the particle
does
not move
indefinitely as there is no infinite path (position
not well defined).“
There are consequences in cosmology
but there should not be for the experiment as the
law remains true as an
approximation.
In cosmology about
the expansion of the universe, we have to stop using only
elementary
mathematics such as the rate of expansion and that is why we find
problems when
calculating (discrepancies).
We have to use
more mathematics and more quantum cosmology.
Quantum
cosmology has to be studied for the period where stars,
planets
etc.. were not yet formed but also for later because stars,
planets
etc… are made of particles or is this argument not enough ?
A remark is that in teleportation we use the
path so there must
be no
hurdle in the path.
People did not
study enough this topic because they chose
topics not good
enough because they do not study philosophy.
In :
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/small-universe-big-bang/
there is
the idea of inflation before the Big Bang and that is not
likely that
it occurred in that way.
Before the
Big Bang; there was a Big Crunch of a previous universe
and I wrote
about that.
It is interesting
to try to know things people think cannot be known.
