About intellectuals

About intellectuals

In the world there are about 7 millions intellectuals because about 1 person

over 1000 persons is able to write a dissertation even if not doing it.

Intellectuals can solve problems by the analysis of causes and therefore

challenge under-development.

Inellectuals in administrations can advise private sectors.

Intellectuals can find how to save energy or water and even how to

satisfy needs with less means. 

To satisfy needs with less means would solve the probleme of climate

change.

Intellectuals are not numerous because there is much anti-intellectualism.

Even in the United States, there is a lot of anti-intellectualism.

The percentage of intellectuals without ethics is not very important.

With intellectuals solving old problems, there will be less anti-intellectualism

in the future.

It takes years for an intellectual to become multi-disciplinary.

Quality of activities is often missing and that has tto be pointed out.

Competence is a criterion not given enough importance.

There is an academic part to competence.

About people who do not value what is valueable by Adib Ben Jebara

About people who do not value what is valuable

There should not be refusal of a job because of overqualification.

Peoople should not leave to their children the concern of learning

a lot of things but have the concern themselves.

People do not value  intellectual level because researchers

were not creative ennough to solve great problems since

60 years ago.

Not to use a lot of formalism is something valuable and 

not valued.

In mathematics, we learn not to use a lot of means for the proofs.

In any business management, we have to look for results

without using a lot of means for less problems.

Less complicated procedures reduce costs.

People have to value looking for less complicated procedures.

Cost effectiveness and time effectiveness are good goals.

https://www.aijbm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/M78135136.pdf

About the goal of the life

 

 Anout the goal of the 

life The goal of the life must be ssome achievement. Multi(disciplinarity is an achievement as multi-disciplinarity is 

not encouraged by the society.

To do like Descartes or Fermat is a good goal for a life. 

 Someone was called an honest man in the France of the eighteenth century if he had some

 knowledge of the sciences. The existence of the afterlife makes it mandatory to make good deeds for being able 

to reach the afterlife and not being confined

Being connected to the Good provides spiritual energy necessary for reaching the afterlife.

An activity of research is a good deed if a calling rather than a source of income.

To do a good work is a good deed.

What people should not be doing

 

About what people should not be doing. People try to get a speciality quickly to start earning money as soon as possible. People do not try to gain knowledge.

People greatest efforts are to seek eating and sex which please the body.

It takes a lot of time to overcome hurdles for anything from the mind.

Many rules prevent great changes. Great changes are necessary because of the climate change being a great problem. Beyond capitalism is the resolution of problems. Less means should be used for anything.

That is the solution to the problem of climate change.

Short communication about the mathematical sky

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr/article/view/3848/3674

 Short communication about the mathematical sky

https://www.aijbm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/B761013.pdf

In the non physical sky, there is the sky of Ideas or Forms of Plato

and beside the sky of Ideas there is the sky of spiritual energies

and beside the sky of spiritual energies there is the mathematical sky.

One question is are spiritual enegies destroyed by the Big Crunch of

the universe ?

But the important question is : are all the thoughts registered as

mathematical waves in the mathematical sky ?

Some thoughts may seem not important and turn out to be important.

So, may be all thoughts should be registered.

People with outstanding intuition can read from the mathematical sky.

Reading from the mathematical sky may seem to be telepathy.

Nowadays people must learn some sobriety for the body for more

activity of the mind.

There is not a philosophy quite new from the Western World because of

extreme specialization since 60 years ago.

Beyond capitalism is the resolution of management problems by analysis of

causes in total quality management.

NEW RESEARCH

https://www.aijbm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/B761013.pdf

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr/article/view/3848/3674

 From: Novel Journal of Applied

Sciences Research
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 5:29 AM
To: Adib Ben Jebara
Subject: RE: Article Accepted For Publication
 Dear Dr. Adib Ben Jebara,
Greetings from the journal!
 Thank you so much for your contribution to our journal.
 Your article entitled “Philosophies of Mathematics”.
Has been accepted for publication

The article was not published, the fee not paid.

Short communication about philosophies of mathematics

Adib Ben Jebara

Retired

Tunis, Tunisia

Ajebara2001@yahoo.com

Keywords : “Adib Ben Jebara’

 

1;INTRODUCTION

From Google search :

In the philosophy of mathematics, formalism is the view that holds that statements of mathematics and logic can be considered to be statements about the consequences of the manipulation of strings (alphanumeric sequences of symbols, usually as equations) using established manipulation rules.

In Platonism, the truth-values of our mathematical assertions depend on facts involving Platonic entities that reside in a realm outside of space-time.

 

In the philosophy of mathematics, constructivism asserts that it is necessary to find (or "construct") a specific example of a mathematical object in order to prove that an example exists.

 

For Logicism, mathematics is an extension of logic, some or all of mathematics is reducible to logic, or some or all of mathematics may be modelled in logic.

 

2.MAIN TEXT

As a Platonist, I wrote :

In : Mathematics: A philosophical approach to Fermat Last Theorem

https://www.ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-2/about-elementary-particles-of-physics

The equation with infinite products zzz…z…=xx…x…+yy…y… with z>y has no solution in the universe where only the restricted axiom CC(2 through x) is true. It is because otherwise the infinite products xx…x… and yy…y… exist but not zzz…z… and we cannot have a side of the equation existing and the other not.

 

And I added in another publication that Desargues wrote

about the infinite in geometry in the 17^th century in France.

And in Logic Colloquium 2004 in Italy, I wrote :

For the continuum hypothesis

Here is a tentative axiom from me to try to prove it.
Axiom :
An infinite subset of the power set of N has a bijection either with a
countable union of (pair wise disjoint) sets of n elements or with a
countable Cartesian products of (pair wise disjoint) sets of n elements.

Mr Andreas Blass proved that this axiom is equivalent to the
continuum hypothesis.

 

3.CONCLUSION

Each philosophy makes some one using it good at some of the tasks.

Formalism makes some one good at combining properties.

Platonism makes some one good at solving problems.

Logicism makes some one good at checking every thing.

Constructivism makes some one good at focusing on things very real.

However, capitalism brought extreme specialization and some

people are not using any philosophy of mathematics.

 

 

In “short communication about why a lot of mathematics are used

in physics” 

I wrote :

“Let us try to apply the axiom of choice of set theory to the vital flow of

biophysics.

Let CC(2 through m) be the countable axiom of choice for sets of n elements,

n from 2 to m.

Let m be the duration of the life of a living cell.

A research is necessary.

m is both a number of urelements of vital flow and a number of moments

of time.”.

https://www.aijbm.com/archive/

Link

https://books.google.tn/books?id=t-56CgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=fr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Linkhttp://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-3/philosophy-of-mathematics-about-afterlife-and-other-philosophical-thoughts

Adib

http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-7/philosophy-of-mathematics-applying-the-theory-of-thoughts-as-mathematical-waves

Adib Ben Jebara

link

https://www.aijbm.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/E293840.pdf

Adib

https://www.aijbm.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/C292022.pdf

Adib Ben Jebara

http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-6/philosophy-of-mathematics-about-research

Adib Ben Jebara

http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-5/philosophy-of-physics-remarks-about-changes-in-physics

link :

http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-4/about-entanglement-of-elementary-particles-of-physics

Link

http://ashese.co.uk/ajp-v3-issue-1/about-elementary-particles-of-physics

Adibhttp://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-2/about-elementary-particles-of-physics

https://adibbenjebara.blogspot.com/2018/11/about-space-and-time.html

https://medwinpublishers.com/PSBJ/index.php

About the teleportation of a proton

Adib Ben Jebara

Retired

Tunis, Tunisia

 Adib.jebara@topnet.tn

January 2022

 

In :

https://www.ashese.co.uk/ajps-v5-issue-3/about-teleportation-of-elementary-particles-of-physics

 

I wrote :

 

In:http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v3-issue-4/about-entanglement-of-elementary-particles-of-physics,  I wrote in one paragraph:

 

About experimenting

“Let us try to describe an experiment where a proton travels a distance in a given time and another experiment where it travels the same distance in no time. After the coupling of 2 protons, the proton which is taken away should instead be left moving by itself. The particle could teleport itself without it being a teleportation of information only”.

 

In:  http://ashese.co.uk/ajps-v6-issue-1/about-a-new-philosophy, I wrote at the end:

 

“It is because we do not know the values of the orthogonal time for the particle that we know the position of the particle onlywith a probability. When we measure, we make the orthogonal time of the particle constant (equal to zero?), that is why we know the position of the particle. We go from a vague knowledge to a precise knowledge rather than change the reality of the position by measuring”.

 

In the first link above, it was stated that the second elementary particle uses only orthogonal time and not time at our level when taken away from the first particle in the entanglement. Time at the level of an elementary particle can be different from time at our level and that is in some manner counterintuitive. Such a research can lead to some research and development but there is the fashion of quantum computing preventing much other research.

.......

there was an early remark, for criticizing, that a hidden variable should be looked for. The hidden variable is no other than the second coordinate of time.

 

 

End of quote from earlier texts.

The suggested experiment of teleportation

looks simple but is not.

It  raises several questions.

The first question is : does the particle travels in our

past until our present or does it travel in our present ?

The second question is :

how far can the paricule travel if not stopped (we are in the case of 2 protons) ?

 

The third question is : has the coupling and entanglement of two protons

to be done like it was done before or could it be done with less means ?

 

The fourth question is : why is it difficult to find someone interested

in the proposal of experiment (published some time ago) ?

Do people think that they must skip anything basic to deserve

their salary ?

 

The fifth question is :

Is there a number of particles for which time becomes totally

ordered ? From aggregating ?

 

I wrote in :

https://www.ashese.co.uk/ajp-v3-issue-1/about-elementary-particles-of-physics

“Let us notice that Newton first law is partly contradicted: F=0, V constant but the particle does

not move indefinitely as there is no infinite path  (position   not   well defined).“

There are consequences in cosmology but there should not be for the experiment as the

law remains true as an approximation.

 

In cosmology about the expansion of the universe, we have to stop using only

elementary mathematics such as the rate of expansion and that is why we find

problems when calculating (discrepancies).

We have to use more mathematics and more quantum cosmology.

 

Quantum cosmology has to be studied for the period where stars,

planets etc.. were not yet formed but also for later because stars,

planets etc… are made of particles or is this argument not enough ?

 

 A remark is that in teleportation we use the path so there must

be no hurdle in the path.

 

People did not study enough this topic because they chose

topics not good enough because they do not study philosophy.

 

In :

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/small-universe-big-bang/

there is the idea of inflation before the Big Bang and that is not

likely that it occurred in that way.

Before the Big Bang; there was a Big Crunch of a previous universe

and I wrote about that.

It is interesting to try to know things people think cannot be known.